Prediction of Maud Folingsby vs Mildred Cazelet Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

HEAD TO HEAD

M. Folingsby vs M. Cazelet

Maud Folingsby
Maud Folingsby

Flag GBR GBR

w
w
l
w
l
w
w
l
w
l
Mildred Cazelet
Mildred Cazelet

Flag GBR GBR

l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
w

1

Win

1

Played

0

Win

0
Age
119
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Folingsby 1 - 0 Cazelet

They have played 2 sets in total, with Maud Folingsby winning 2 and Mildred Cazelet winning 0. The last match between Maud Folingsby and Mildred Cazelet was at the Roehampton, 16-04-1928, Round: R4, Surface: Clay, with Maud Folingsby getting the victory 6-0 10-8.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Folingsby1
Cazelet0
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R4Roehampton(04-16-28)

Clay
GBR Flag
Maud Folingsby
6
10
GBR Flag
Mildred Cazelet
0
8

M. Folingsby vs M. Cazelet H2H Profile

Stats
$0Career Prize Money$0
42.54% (57-77)Career Total W/L11.76% (2-15)
1Clay0
1Total H2H Matches0
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

M. Folingsby vs M. Cazelet Match Preview:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Maud Folingsby has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Mildred Cazelet has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Maud Folingsby, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mildred Cazelet has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Maud Folingsby has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mildred Cazelet has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Maud Folingsby has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Mildred Cazelet winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Maud Folingsby has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 31/35), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 30% (W/L 10/23). Mildred Cazelet has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 47% (W/L 1/6), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 0% (W/L 0/2).
  • Player level: In the last year, Maud Folingsby has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Mildred Cazelet has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Maud Folingsby winning 1 times and Mildred Cazelet being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Maud Folingsby winning 2 and Mildred Cazelet winning 0.
  • The last match between Maud Folingsby and Mildred Cazelet was at the Roehampton, 16-04-1928, Round: R4, Surface: Clay, with Maud Folingsby getting the victory 6-0 10-8.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Maud Folingsby has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Mildred Cazelet has played against players with an average rank of 0.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Maud Folingsby has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mildred Cazelet has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Maud Folingsby has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mildred Cazelet has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Maud Folingsby vs Mildred Cazelet Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Folingsby vs M. Cazelet H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
1H2H Matches Won0
2Sets Won0
16Games Won8
0:0:0Average Match Time0:0:0
100% (1/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Folingsby 0%, Cazelet 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Folingsby 0%, Cazelet 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Folingsby 0%, Cazelet 0%.

M. Folingsby Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
GrassLondon Middlesex - 26-05-1930

R2

GBRH. Barr
L
6-4 6-2
GrassHarpenden - 19-05-1930

R3

GBRM. Stork
L
5-7 6-3 6-2

R2

GBRO. N
W
7-5 10-8
N/AWest Kensington - 12-05-1930

R2

GBRM. R
W
6-2 6-2

R3

N/AU. Player
W
9-7 7-5

M. Cazelet Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
ClaySutton - 24-09-1928

R4

GBRE. Pittman
L
6-1 6-1

R3

GBRD. Burton
W
6-3 6-2
ClayFulham - 17-09-1928

R2

GBRI. Robinson
L
6-3 6-1
GrassEastbourne - 10-09-1928

R2

GBRP. Watson
L
6-0 6-1
GrassEpsom - 09-07-1928

R2

GBRM. Phayre
L
6-0 6-3
banner

M. Folingsby vs M. Cazelet Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
42.54% (57/77)YTD Win/Loss11.76% (2/15)
45.24% (133/161)Sets Win/Loss14.29% (5/30)
47.28% (1280/1427)Games Win/Loss28.78% (80/198)
46.97% (31/35)Clay Win/Loss12.50% (1/7)
45.83% (11/13)Indoor Hard W/L0% (0/0)
30.30% (10/23)Grass Win/Loss14.29% (1/6)
1st MatchAverage Match Time1st Match
42% (55/130)Best of 3 Sets Win %12% (2/17)
31% (10/32)Deciding Set Win %0% (0/1)
84% (58/49)1st Set Won, Won Match67% (3/2)
16% (58/9)1st Set Won, Lost Match33% (3/1)
8% (73/6)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (14/0)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

02:35 PM 20/11/25
Prediction
ESPJ. A. M. Clar
CZEJ. Lehecka
W1
2.375
W2
1.5
02:15 PM 20/11/25
Prediction
CZEZ. Kolar7
DENE. Moller3
W1
1.95
W2
1.74
06:30 PM 20/11/25
Prediction
BRAJ. L. R. D. Silva1
ARGG. I. Justo
W1
1.34
W2
2.93
05:00 PM 20/11/25
Prediction
BRAM. Alves
BRAG. Heide
W1
2.72
W2
1.39
08:00 PM 20/11/25
Prediction
ARGF. Mena
ARGJ. EstevezALT
W1
1.27
W2
3.34
05:00 PM 20/11/25
Prediction
BRAE. RibeiroALT
ARGF. D. Acosta3
W1
4.65
W2
1.146